My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-23-2004 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2004
>
09-23-2004 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />While safety should be a pazamount public interest, preserving historical chazacter should <br />also be ~an important consideration. In order to conform to current code, the 1700 Roscoe <br />garage door would need to be relocated to the adjacent SW side, resulting in the balance _ _ <br />of the back yazd being paved over as a driveway.2 The back yazd green space would be <br />eliminated and the houses historical chazacter seriously altered. ~ .- <br />(2) Literal ordinance enforcement must result in a hardship <br />1700 Roscoe was built over 100 yeazs ago: Houses of that period did not have <br />significant storage spaces since material possessions was significantly below today's <br />standards. The Roscoe house has 2300 ft2, but only 5 sma112'x3' closets. The attic <br />joists are only 4", limiting their storage load potential and accessibility (especially if 12" <br />blown insulation is installed). Hence it is proposed to extend the southwest side of.the <br />garage out 10 feet to ease the storage issue. In order to conform to city ordinance, <br />relocating the garage door to the adjacent wall would result in a less eiTicient garage . <br />layout which can only be addressed by enlarging the gazage an additional 5 to 10 feet. <br />(3) ~ Granting variance does not violate~spirit of the ordinances <br />The spirit of the ordinance is~assumed to be public safety. As mentioned previously; . <br />Roscoe Streets limited speeds and use minimize public risk. To compensate, additional <br />safety protective layers can be designed into the structure to compensate if deemed <br />necessary. From a historical perspective, the gazage plans called for a cupola and <br />sheathing in #117 treated wood siding, matching the house. <br />(4) Granting a variance that allows. use prohibited within use zone. <br />Not a concern since the gauge extension is intended for use as a residential gazage and <br />not for business interest: <br />v~ <br />1~~3~JH <br />? ~ In order not to violate the " 25 ft from .comer ordinance", this scenario requires the driveway to exit ~ . <br />onto Holmes in a narrow slit.between a utility pole and.a large oak tree on the easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.