My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-23-2004 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2004
>
09-23-2004 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.+ '' • • <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of September 23, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br />Mr. Sabo noted that the size and visibility of the proposed hotel was an issue at the previous <br />meeting. The Board had requested and was provided line-0f--sight diagrams relating to <br />traffic on Highway 146 and ,the Best Western Motel in relation to the site of the proposed <br />hotel. Mr. Sabo noted that the proposed hotel, being set back from Highway 146, is at a <br />disadvantage. <br />Mr. Sabo stated there was concerns voiced at the last meeting from other motel/hotel <br />owners in La Porte, that the 60% occupancy rates could not support another motel, however, <br />the applicant's market study indicates the hotel would be a viable option. <br />Mr. Sabo answered questions from the Board. Mr. Legrand commented a financial issue <br />should not be the primary consideration. He questioned how the 45' requirement came to <br />be. Mr. Legrand did not want any action taken and suggested the height matter be returned <br />to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. Ms. Norwine commented that the <br />ordinance should be changed to allow all businesses the same opportunities. <br />In response to Mr. Legrand's question about why the maximum height requirement is 45', <br />Mr. Sabo stated the height issue was discussed at the previous Planning 8~ Zoning <br />Commission meeting with regard to fire fighting capabilities and line-of-sight. It was <br />mentioned that some in-fill developments could create circumstances requiring <br />exceptions/variances. <br />Assistant Fire Chief John Dunham answered questions from the Board. Mr. Dunham stated <br />the City possesses a 100' aerial tower capable of reaching the 7~' floor of a building. He <br />noted that the key for protecting high-rise buildings is built-in fire protection, conforming to <br />the codes and ordinances. Mr. Dunham confirmed the City's capability for fighting a fire on <br />the 4'h floor of the proposed hotel. <br />B. PROPONENTS <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Bobby Grisham, co-owner of Grisham-Toler Properties in Deer <br />Park. Mr. Grisham feels the highest and best use for the property is a hotel and it needs to <br />be four stories in order to be feasible. <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Ronald Hams, of 7118 Red Coral Dr., Pasadena. Mr. Hams is a <br />commercial lender for South Trust Bank located at SH 146 and Fairmont. Mr. Hams spoke <br />of his experience as a commercial. lender and with his business relationship with the <br />applicant. Mr. Harris responded to questions from Mr. Legrand. <br />Chairperson Grant swore in Rahul Desai, 7618 Betty Jane, Houston. ~Mr. and Mrs. Desai <br />developed the Best Western in La Porte in 1995 and eventually two more properties in Deer <br />Park. He purchased the land for the proposed hotel in 1999. Since 1999, the type of <br />development envisioned for this property is no longer feasible for the amount of land and the <br />adjacent land is not available for sale. <br />C. OPPONENTS <br />There were none. <br />Public input ended at 6:50 P.M. <br />Ms. Norwine stated that at the last meeting she might have given the impression that she was <br />opposed to the development. She clarified that she would like to see the hotel built, but does not feel <br />there is a hardship requiring a variance. She feels this is an ordinance issue that should be <br />addressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.