Laserfiche WebLink
City of La Porte, Texas <br />March 17, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />Given the advance refunding nature of the issue, which is timing and interest rate sensitive, it is our <br />recommendation that the debt be sold by the negotiated sale method. Given the size of the issue, it is our <br />recommendation that the City utilize a two handed underwriting syndicate for maximum distribution. The City <br />has historical relationships with two underwriting firms including Coastal Securities and BOSC, Inc. and has <br />indicated a desire to utilize those firms with Coastal Securities as the lead underwriter. We concur with that <br />decision. It is also our recommendation, in order to minimize costs of issuance, that the City once again only <br />utilize one rating agency. In the previous two refundings, each of which were under $10.0 million in par, the <br /> <br />T: <br />IMING <br />General Obligation Refunding Bonds do not require any special notices or public hearings. There are two <br />methods for handling council approval. The first is the more traditional in that the Council approves a plan of <br />finance and authorizes the Director of Finance, working with the Financial Advisor, to proceed with rating <br />presentations, document preparation and set a predetermined date to sell the bonds and bring to the Council an <br />ordinance complete with interest rates for Council approval. The second method has become popular in the past <br />3-, an ordinance authorizing the <br />issuance of the debt is presented to council that does not set out the final interest rates of the issue but instead <br />delegates the authority to negotiate such final terms to one or more City officials; typically the City Manager <br />and/or the Director of Finance, SO LONG AS CERTAIN PARAMETERS APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL <br />ARE MET. The parameters set out in the ordinance included a maximum amount of debt to be issued, the <br />maximum level of interest rates that can be approved, a maximum maturity of the debt and a minimum level of <br />savings that must be achieved. Finally, the ordinance would put a time limit on the authorization. In this <br />manner, City administration has the latitude to monitor the market as preparations are made and to choose the <br />market conditions in which to enter rather than being forced to accept whatever market conditions exist at the <br />time of a predetermined sale date. Given the timing of document preparation, rating agency availability and City <br />Council meetings, we believe and expect the traditional method will work and it is our expectation to use that <br />method. Should unforeseen circumstances arise, we may reconsider the parameters resolution method. <br />The attached timetable of events reflects this recommendation with the expectation that the complete ordinance <br />would be adopted on March 24, 2014. <br />S: <br />UMMARY <br />Interest rates are at very attractive level and give the City the opportunity to lock in substantial savings without <br />incurring interest rate risk. We recommend that the City not only move forward with the refunding but, given <br />the projected capital improvement projects, utilize the proposed structure to accommodate a potential new <br />money debt issuance in 2015. <br />303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 220 (210) 805-1118 RBC Capital Markets <br />San Antonio, TX 78215 Member NYSE/SIPC <br /> <br />