My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
06-23-14 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
City Council Meetings
>
2014
>
06-23-14 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 8:32:14 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:33:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
6/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i.Ensure that the drawing of the existing utilities is provided to the applicant as part of the <br /> <br />response to the applicant. <br />ii.If NaviLine is continued to be used to track utility verification requests, save a PDF of the utility <br /> <br />drawing as an attachment to the NaviLine file so that all data related to the request can be <br />obtained in one location. <br /> <br />4.Until NaviLine is able to produce the information needed for the monthly reports, the reports should <br /> <br />be reconfigured to eliminate the time and effort needed to track information manually. Currently, <br />some data for the monthly and quarterly reports is tracked manually because it is not accessible from <br />NaviLine. <br /> <br />The Department has considered dispensing of manual collection of information that may no longer have <br />administrative value. <br /> <br />5.Establish and publish plan review time goals for the most commonly issued permits. This information <br /> <br />will provide the customer with a reasonable expectation and establish accountability for the staff. <br /> <br />There has been an unwritten policy that dictates building plan review turn-around time goals. These <br />review time goals have now been incorporated into a written department policy by which the public <br />can reasonably expect response. <br /> <br />6.Allow simple plan sets to be reviewed quickly while more complex plan sets are being reviewed in the <br /> <br />background. To expedite simpler plan sets, establish and use a priority process rather than a <br />chronological (first come-first served) policy. <br /> <br />Permits that require a shorter plan review time, such as fence, roof, fill dirt, portable sign, demolition, <br />etc. continue to be fast-tracked. Additionally, staff continues to issue over-the-counter permits for <br />plumbing, electrical and mechanical work. <br /> <br />7.Establish a simplified fence permitting process. The current system is both time consuming and <br /> <br />expensive and is a source of consistent frustration and complaints. To expedite standard fence <br />replacements in the same location, do not require site plans or formal surveys. Utilize standard details <br />as a condition of approval (setting posts, attachment of runners and pickets, etc.). If a fence is on a <br />common property line, perhaps require consent from the neighbor to waive the site plan requirement. <br />As a further relaxation, the site plan requirement for new fences could also be waived with location <br />restrictions being issued as permit conditions. <br />The fence permitting process has been simplified by eliminating the requirement for a survey. In lieu <br />of a survey, staff is allowing the customer to submit plan grade information. This has been adopted <br />by departmental policy. <br /> <br />8 Planning Department Review Mueller Management/Ron Cox Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.