My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
06-23-14 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
City Council Meetings
>
2014
>
06-23-14 Regular Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 8:32:14 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:33:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
6/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3.Develop and consistently use checklists for each reviewer. The contents of each checklist should be <br /> <br />unique to the items for which each reviewer is responsible and approved by the Planning Director. <br />Periodically update the checklists as new or recurring issues arise. The checklists can be provided <br />directly to the applicants in advance to better inform them of the requirements. Further the completed <br />checklists can also be provided to the applicants to eliminate the time and effort required to compile all <br />comments into one review letter. <br /> <br />The predevelopment applicant checklist will be provided to applicants during predevelopment <br />meetings and will contain website links to department specific applications, processes and <br />development criteria. <br /> <br />4.Ensure all reviewers are submitting comments electronically in a consistent form (Word document or <br /> <br />NaviLine) using the checklists described above; also consider requiring reviewers to provide marked-up <br />plan sets for return to the applicant. <br /> <br />All reviewers have been submitting comments electronically. Staff has implemented the Naviline <br />response protocol as the standard of operation. Subsequent training was provided to reviewers on 4- <br />30-13. Additionally, training on electronic mark-ups of redlines will be scheduled after acquisition of <br />Adobe Pro for all reviewers. <br /> <br />5.Ensure review deadlines for each application are communicated and enforced for all reviewers (inside <br /> <br />and outside of the Planning Department). <br /> <br />Five day review deadlines have been communicated via memo from the Planning Director to all <br />reviewers and will be reiterated in a project memo with each Naviline application. <br /> <br />6.Establish review turn-around time goals for re-submittals. <br /> <br /> <br />The goal is to complete the review of resubmitted plans within three (3) business days, but not to <br />exceed five (5) business days from the date of resubmittal. If the plan is not approved, written <br />communication will be provided to the applicant outlining the deficiencies. Once the plan is approved, <br />a signed copy of the plan will be returned to the applicant. <br /> <br />7.Establish and enforce a policy that additional comments will not be added on resubmittals. Exception: <br /> <br />when the applicant has made changes to the plans subsequent to the prior submittal. <br /> <br />A policy has been created disallowing additional comments on resubmittals, except when the <br />applicant has made changes to the plans subsequent to the prior submittal. <br /> <br />8.Research the ability of NaviLine to assign a project number using an HCAD parcel number (if NaviLine <br /> <br />tracking of site plans is continued). Currently, site plan applications can not be entered until an address <br />10 Planning Department Review Mueller Management/Ron Cox Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.