My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-11-21 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
City Council
>
2020's
>
2021 (2)
>
10-11-21 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2022 12:52:00 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 3:31:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/11/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
share participation, with the county contributing the least cost share among the project partners and/or <br />beneficiaries. If a future bond election is identified as a source of funding, this should be reported in the <br />submittal. Forms of cost-share participation may include: <br /> <br /> Direct agency funding <br /> <br /> Non-cash contributions (e.g., rights of way); <br /> <br /> Previously acquired land required for the project (not to exceed 30% of an cost share <br />credit); and <br /> <br /> Third-party funding sources (e.g., federal funds or private contributions). <br /> <br />I. Operations and Maintenance Costs to Harris County (6 Points) <br /> <br />Total operations and maintenance costs Ʒƚ ĬĻ ĬƚƩƓĻ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ /ƚǒƓƷǤ. Maximum ratings are assigned to <br />requests with minimal operations and maintenance costs to be borne by the County or HCFCD. <br /> <br />Maintenance Projects Prioritization Criteria <br /> <br />Established prioritization criteria will allow Precinct staff to uniformly evaluate agency requested <br />maintenance projects. Any assets repaired through this program shall remain maintained by its <br />current agency. <br />Project submittals that do not incorporate LOIs are disqualified from consideration. Through the <br />weighted criteria listed below, a maximum total of 100 points per project is possible. If insufficient data <br />is provided for a criterion, no points will be awarded in that category. No set point threshold exists for <br /> established following evaluation <br />of a given yea Prioritization criteria, maximum point value <br />and associated submittal requirements are listed below: <br />A. Project Description (0 Points) <br /> <br />A summary of the proposed project, including a location map and information concerning project goals, <br />problems to be addressed, anticipated project features, and relationships to any other planned, ongoing <br />or completed infrastructure projects. <br /> <br /> <br />B. Safety (25 Points) <br /> <br />Existing threats to life and property. Fewer points will be awarded to those projects that are intended to <br />resolve issues caused by inadequate regulation by the requesting agency. The submittal should answer <br />some or all these questions: <br /> <br /> Is the project intended to address an existing flooding hazard, traffic safety, and or mobility issue? <br /> ¯¦ȁ Ε <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.