Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 <br />commissioned a second lift station evaluation study to determine <br />five highest priority projects. That evaluation study identified <br />14 <br />priority projects as well as a need for $2,082,000 in funding: <br />Lift Station 13; <br />Lift Station 14; <br />Lift Station 19; and <br />Lift Station 37 (scheduled for completion Jan. 2012). <br />Key Planning Considerations <br />1)Addressing long-term expansion and rehabilitation needs within t <br />existing systems through targeted capital improvements (e.g., to <br />deteriorated older pipes, increasing line sizes, removing dead-e <br />adding additional water storage). <br />2)Supporting effective, ongoing planning and system monitoring in <br />parallel with land use and development tracking to ensure that needed <br />infrastructure is available in the remaining areas of future growth and <br />and continuing service demands. <br />GOAL 2: Improved data collection and analysis of public utility <br />infrastructure systems to help prioritize the short- and long-te <br />maintenance needs for existing infrastructure. <br /> <br />Actions and Initiatives <br />Utility Mapping Program <br />1)Complete the geographic information system (GIS) mapping <br />database, i.e., Utility Mapping Program, by providing additional <br /> <br />In the update to the <br />resources to capture and input the necessary data for a complete <br />Comprehensive Plan in 2005, it <br />asset management program. (see inset) This system should be <br />was indicated that public utilitiy <br />utilized to maintain records on inflow and infiltration (I/I) pr <br />infrastructure GIS mapping <br />and main breaks, types and sizes of piping, dates of improvement <br />should be complete by 2007. <br />and repairs, and other information relevant to an asset manageme <br />Today, some of the data is <br />system. Data should be used as a prioritization tool in the <br />mapped, particularly the <br />preparation of annual budgets and capital improvement programs. <br />2)Conduct a system-wide condition analysis of all utility infrastr, <br />However, to realize the full <br />i.e., storm sewer, water, and wastewater, to determine an <br />potential of utlity mapping, <br />appropriate short- and long-term plan of action to repair, <br />additional attribute data is <br />rehabilitate, or replace existing utility infrastructure. Inform <br />needed to complete the <br />should be entered into the Utility Mapping Program to identify <br />database. For example, if all <br />targeted geographic areas with the greatest needs. <br />breaks and repairs are mapped, <br />3)Allocate the necessary funding on an annual basis to implement t <br />the resulting data over time <br />corrections identified in the conditions analysis <br />would help to prioritize limited <br />limited funds can be expended in a cost-effective, efficient, an <br />funding to mitigate the areas <br />timely manner to correct the greatest areas of need. <br />that are in the most need of <br />4)Continue inter-departmental coordination between the Planning, <br />repair. <br />Engineering, and Parks and Recreation Departments to offer <br /> <br />14 <br /> HDR/Claunch & Miller Lift Station Evaluation Study. 2008 <br />3.10 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />