Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT C <br />intersection for the study peak hours. These peak hour factors are shown on the <br />turning movement count sheets and vary depending on the peak hour of interest. <br />ranged from 0.88 to 0.94, <br />indicating a fairly evenly divided travel demand during the peak hour. <br />M. Pedestrian Facilities <br />There are no existing sidewalks on South 16 Street along the site frontage on either <br />th <br />the east or west sides of the roadway. The newer Ferguson Distribution site does <br />have a sidewalk along its South 16 Street frontage. According to PICM, Section 6, <br />th <br />construction of a sidewalk along the site frontage would be required. <br />During the site visits, no pedestrian activity was noted. <br />N. Existing Level of Service of Roadway Sections and Intersections <br />This traffic impact analysis employed the macroscopic traffic simulation model <br />Synchro, as well as the microscopic model SimTraffic, both part of the Synchro Pro <br />8.0 Simulation Suite. Synchro was used to input the roadway network geometry and <br />signal timing parameters. If a signal timing optimization was completed, Synchro was <br />used to optimize the signal timings. Most simulations were undertaken with Synchro, <br />but some using SimTraffic to verify the Synchro findings. In some cases, microscopic <br />traffic simulation models have advantages when simulating networks of mixed traffic <br />control (signalized and unsignalized intersections adjacent in a network). Some of <br />these advantages include much more robust simulation of actuated signal <br />operations, more realistic gap acceptance simulation at unsignalized intersections, <br />and more realistic arrival and departure sequences through arterial networks. All <br />simulations in this study represent the peak 15 minute time periods within any peak <br />hour. In general, the simulation results for the weekday peak periods could be <br />generalized to represent almost an hour of traffic volumes since the volumes are <br />relatively flat over the weekday peaks. <br />For each of the critical peak hours identified for the development and adjacent <br />roadway network, existing LOS were determined using the manual traffic counts <br />taken in March 2016. <br />Table 2 presents the per-vehicle delay thresholds that define each level of service. <br />An explanation of the concept of level of service is that it is similar to grades in school <br />A is the best, F the worst. Level of service (LOS) for signalized intersections is <br />defined in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel <br />consumption, and lost travel time. Delay is a complex measure, and is dependent <br />Page 8 <br />Voigt Associates, Inc. Project 30605 GCP 16 Street Traffic Impact Analysis <br />th <br />March 2016 Prepared for Generational Commercial <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />