Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT C <br />on a number of variables, including the quality of the signal progression, the cycle <br />length, the green time ratio, and the v/c ratio for the lane group or approach in <br />question. LOS is directly related to the control delay value. <br />Note that the LOS thresholds are different for signalized intersections as compared <br />to unsignalized intersections. The criteria for stop-controlled intersections have <br />different threshold values than to those for signalized intersections primarily because <br />drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct types of transportation <br />facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher <br />traffic volumes than a stop-controlled intersection. Thus, a higher level of control <br />delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. At a <br />two-way stop-controlled intersection, LOS is defined for each minor movement, but <br />not for the intersection as a whole. <br />Table 2. LOS Thresholds for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections. <br />Level of Service (LOS) Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections <br />Control Delay Per Vehicle Control Delay Per Vehicle <br />(sec/veh) (sec/veh) <br />A 0-10 <br />B >10-20 >10-15 <br />C >20-35 >15-25 <br />D >35-55 >25-35 <br />E >55-80 >35-50 <br />F >80 >50 <br />Table 3 summarizes the existing intersection LOS for each of the study intersections <br />during each critical peak hour identified for this study. The delays reported within this <br />report represent the average delay in the peak 15-minute time period within each <br />peak hour, not the average delay over the entire peak hour as a whole. As shown in <br />Table 3 and Table 4, all intersections in the study area are currently operating at very <br />good levels of service in the peak hour (at LOS B/C), with LOS D as the typical <br />threshold for intersection operations in urban and suburban environments. From field <br />observation, the existing weekday signal timings are quite appropriate for the existing <br />traffic volume conditions and the signal operation is generally characterized by crisp <br />movement phase to phase and good coordination. The signal timings are typically <br />running only minimum phase lengths as it appears that demand is relatively light <br />most of the day, even with an assumed growth rate of 3% per year, the average <br />control delays would not be estimated to change significantly from existing 2016 to <br />Page 9 <br />Voigt Associates, Inc. Project 30605 GCP 16 Street Traffic Impact Analysis <br />th <br />March 2016 Prepared for Generational Commercial <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />