My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-03-16 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-03-16 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 7:48:11 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:37:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/16/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 9 0 <br />• <br />ANALYSIS <br />• <br />Any numerical comparison of the types of proposals made' to the City of <br />La Porte must be accompanied by a discussion of the structural differ- <br />ences which are significant. The primary differences are cash flow and <br />the degree to which total cost is sensitive to actual loss experience. <br />In a conventional insured program the rates are guaranteed for a certain <br />period of time. If losses are lower than expected, the insurance <br />company makes a larger profit; if losses are greater than expected, no. <br />additional charge is made for that year's losses. However, for a group <br />the size of the City of La Porte, the actual loss experience will be <br />considered in calculting the renewal insurance rates. Monthly cost is <br />stable as it varies only with the actual number of employees and depend- <br />ents. <br />A retention plan differs from a conventional plan only in the way <br />renewal rates are calculated. Actual losses and insurance company <br />expense are compared to premium and a surplus on deficiency is deter- <br />mined. This surplus or deficiency is then a more direct part of the <br />calculation of renewal premium rates than in a conventional insurance <br />program. <br />A retro program is a more loss sensitive insured program which typically <br />allows for a reduced premium paid during the policy year of about 10%. <br />The insurance company then has a right to additional premiums if justi- <br />fied by the loss experience. Monthly payments are even throughout the <br />policy year just like a conventional program, but an additional payment <br />of premium may be required at the end of the year. Some companies allow <br />a 90 day premium deferral with their retro so that most of the cash flow <br />advantages of a self -insured plan are achieved. <br />A minimum premium plan allows the insured to pay losses as they occur; <br />the monthly premium cost is for excess coverage and services only. This <br />allows the insured to retain the cash flow benefits. This plan is also <br />loss sensitive such that total cost is lower than the plans previously <br />discussed if actual losses are lower than expected, but a higher total <br />cost is generated when actual losses are higher. The degree of loss <br />limitation (excess coverage) included in the plan varies with each <br />insurance company. <br />The Administrative Services Only (ASO) plan is a self -insured plan with <br />excess coverage for each individual and an aggregate stop -loss at 125% <br />of expected paid claims as estimated by the insurance company. The <br />expenses for service and excess coverage are generally lower in this <br />type of plan than any other but the potential for higher total cost due <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.