My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-03-16 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-03-16 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 7:48:11 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:37:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/16/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
j 0 0 <br />I <br />6 <br />to adverse loss experience is also greater. The <br />self-insurance are retained by the self -insured. <br />stable, this is generally the most cost-effective <br />cash flow benefits of <br />If losses remain <br />program available. <br />The Summary of Lowest Cost Proposals reflects the estimated cost of each <br />proposal at expected cost and at maximum cost. The main issues to <br />consider in choosing the optimal proposal are the estimated cost, <br />maximum cost, cash flow advantages, and the degree of fluctuation in <br />cost which is acceptable to the City of La Porte. <br />In evaluating estimated cost from this Summary, the difference between <br />the lowest cost (Fred. S. James ASO Plan) and the highest cost (Strum/ - <br />Hartford Minimum Premium Plan) is $15,124. However, there is much <br />greater difference in the potential maximum cost. The Blue Cross/Blue <br />Shield conventional plan offers the least amount of fluctuation in cost <br />and the most even cash flow, but it does not allow for any savings if <br />losses are lower than expected or any cash flow advantages. The esti- <br />mated total cost is $9,699 higher than the lowest cost alternative (ASO) <br />if you consider the amount of claims to be paid in subsequent years in <br />the ASO program. However, the nature of the cash flow of an ASO plan is <br />such that the claims incurred in year one but paid in subsequent years <br />becomes a part of the subsequent year cost. Therefore, the lag in <br />claims payment can be viewed as a "permanent" deferral. <br />From this perspective, the difference in expected cost between the Blue <br />Cross/Blue Shield plan and the Fred. S. James plan is $105,362 in year <br />one but would be fairly close to the same cost in subsequent years if <br />losses remain at expected levels. If losses increase, claims paid in <br />the ASO plan will cause an increase in total cost, but second year <br />premiums in the insured plan would also increase. In effect, an organi- <br />zation the size of the City of La Porte will ultimately pay most (if not <br />all) of its own losses plus expenses under any of these plans -- the <br />difference is primarily one of timing. <br />It is our opinion that the City of La Porte should select either the <br />Blue Cross/Blue Shield plan or the Fred. S. James plan, depending on the <br />degree of risk and fluctuation in cash flow the City is comfortable <br />with. <br />�k <br />-2- <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.