Laserfiche WebLink
When You Put It That Way, <br />They May Have a Point <br />EVEN Essex County, New Jersey municipalities <br />S intend to sue the county and the state for over <br />$30 million for "unnecessary" disposal costs, accord- <br />ing to the National Solid Wastes Management As- <br />sociation. Disposal fees in Essex communities rose <br />305 percent in August 1987 when waste was shipped <br />out of state. The municipalities contend that Essex <br />County and the New Jersey State Department of <br />Environmental Protection failed to plan adequately <br />for the County's solid waste disposal. <br />A spokesman for the group contends that the mu- <br />nicipalities would not have had to incur the enor- <br />mous costs if the county and state had met their obliga- <br />tions for waste disposal detailed in the Solid Waste <br />Management Act. This act bars individual munici- <br />palities from seeking their own solutions, thus rely- <br />ing on county and state planning, according to the <br />spokesman. <br />Some believe that this case will be the first of many <br />by local officials upset by the high cost of waste <br />disposal. <br />Thumbs Down on Hazardous <br />Waste Handler Inspections <br />NDER the Resource Conservation and Recov- <br />U ery Act (RCRA), EPA has established a regu- <br />latory framework for controlling and managing the <br />generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and <br />disposal of hazardous waste. Waste handler inspec- <br />tions are the primary means by which EPA and <br />states authorized by EPA to administer the RCRA <br />program assure themselves that regulatory re- <br />quirements are being met. <br />However, "State, EPA regional, and EPA con- <br />tract inspectors are not detecting a substantial <br />number of regulatory violations during inspections <br />(of hazardous waste handlers) -many of which are <br />considered by EPA to warrant immediate attention <br />because of the severe environmental threats they <br />pose." So states a report by the General Accounting <br />Office (GAO) entitled "Hazardous Waste: Facility <br />Inspections Are Not Thorough and Complete <br />t GAO /RCED-88-20)," which was requested by the <br />Chairman, Subcommittee on Transportation, <br />Tourism, and Hazardous Materials, House Commit- <br />tee on Energy and Commerce. <br />It should come as no surprise that "A lack of in- <br />spector training and limited experience were cited <br />v as primary causes for inspection deficiencies by EPA <br />headquarters inspection experts who witnessed and <br />critiqued 26 RCRA inspections for GAO." The report <br />continues: "Guidance for conducting RCRA inspec- <br />tions is incomplete. In addition, EPA has not estab- <br />lished specific qualification standards for RCRA in- <br />spectors, which has resulted in an inspector corps <br />with a variety of backgrounds." <br />States Mull Barriers to Solid Waste Imports <br />A LARMED by escalating shipments ofout-of-state <br />wastes across their borders, officials in Pennsyl- <br />vania, Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia are seek- <br />ing ways to limit these unwanted imports and pre- <br />serve landfill capacity for their own future use. The <br />shipments cannot be totally prohibited - a U.S. <br />Supreme Court decision has declared refuse hauling <br />to be constitutionally protected interstate commerce <br />-but steps are being taken to place caps on the <br />quantities of imported waste that may be accepted <br />by private landfills. <br />These actions spell new worries for several New <br />Jersey counties where landfill space has been <br />exhausted and alternative disposal facilities are still <br />in the planning stage. In the northeast corner of the <br />state, Passaic County has shipped all refuse out-of- <br />state since December 1, while Morris and Bergen <br />counties expect such transfer operations to com- <br />mencenext March. If other states succeed in limiting <br />the tonnage of waste that can be transported across <br />their borders, a troublesome situation will become <br />even more precarious. <br />AAA Study Links Drunk Driving with Beer Ads <br />T HE AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has re- <br />leased astudy by university media communica- <br />tion specialists that suggests TV beer commercials <br />play a significant role in the over-involvement of <br />males in drunk driving. The report, "Myths, Men <br />and Beer: An Analysis of Beer Commercials on <br />Broadcast Television, 1987," was made by a team of <br />university researchers who call for review of public <br />policies related to beer TV advertising because, they <br />claim, beer is represented in TV commercials as an <br />essential element in masculinity. Beer commercials, <br />say the researchers, promote an association be- <br />tweendrinking and driving. Copies of the report may <br />be obtained by writing to the AAA Foundation for <br />Traffic Safety, 2990 Telestar Court, Suite 100, Falls <br />Church, Virginia 22042. <br />PUBLIC WORKS for February, 1988 <br />