My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1989-11-13 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1989
>
1989-11-13 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:01 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:43:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/13/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />An~ot~tion, page 5 <br /> <br />-; <br /> <br />effect of transferring employment. The term "primarily" as used <br />here and elsewhere means a majority of the jobs must be new. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Section 2h4. Deals wi th_ the competi ti ve problems created by <br />abatement. It .provides that the facility must be necessary <br />because the prospect cannot conduct business using existing <br />capuci ty when a reasonable financial allo\lance is made for the <br />improvements necessary to bring that existing property up to <br />specitica tion. This particular circumstance is appropriate to <br />office headquarters location. With 40 to 50 cillion square feet <br />ot empty officc space in the community, it is hard to iffiagine a <br />situation where another office building would be justificd. On <br />the other hand, a corporate headquarters might be justified i~ <br />an area such as Clear Lake where there is a shortage of office <br />space. It would be reasonable to abate because of the ~ultiplier <br />efiect on jobs. In another case, if a company h~d u~ique uific~ <br />requiremcnts that could not be met with existing property, we <br />$hould be able to abate rather than 165~ the jobs. Yet \Ie du Hot <br />waITt; to grant blanket exemption to office buildings (even for <br />headquarters) that might add to the space glut, cause the loss of <br />taxes or put owners at a disadvantage. If a developer or anyone <br />el~e can make a reasonable case that existing property can be <br />used efficiently, abatement will not be granted. <br />'. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Section 2i Describes and specifies ta^able status of proper~y cn <br />the fucility. <br /> <br />Section 3a. Informs the potential applican where to fil~ an <br />-application for abate~ent. <br /> <br />Section 3b. Dcscribes the information that must bc in the <br />application. Notice that the details filed with the application <br />are e:ctensive and provide the necessary information for the <br />County to determine whether the abatement complies with the <br />intent of these guidelines. In the case oi modernization, it <br />requires a 5eparate rendering of real and personal properties for <br />the purpose of establishing the base year value. Also notice that <br />the county is authorized to r~quire such other financial <br />iniormation as it ~a7.deem appropriate. In this case, it may be <br />apprcpriate to look at the resources or the applicant, clcarar,c.;es <br />\-Ii th respect to pollution or environmental impacts, and other <br />information. <br /> <br />Section 3c. Provides a show-cause hearing and a 30-day \lait <br />period before the hearing to allow for thorough investigation by <br />the public and affected parties. <br /> <br />-.., <br /> <br />Section 3d.' Provides for a speedy 60-day e::ecution of the <br />a?plication. It is required that the county notify the applicant <br />if the abatement \vill be approved or not. The approval rc:::olution <br />constitutes an intent on the part of the county to execute an <br />agreement. It al~o provides that it tc:.kcs a commisioner to <br /> <br />/ <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.