My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1991-01-14 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1991
>
1991-01-14 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:02 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:45:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/14/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF LA PORTE <br />INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />T0: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager <br />FROM: Jeff Litchfield, Director of Financ <br />DATE: January 8, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: Amending the 1990-91 Budget <br />• <br />I want to make a change in the method of accounting for purchase orders that <br />are open at the end of the fiscal year. This change is very painless and will <br />reduce our workload considerably. <br />In the past, purchase orders at the end of the year are encumbered against the <br />old fiscal year. What this means is that we show a portion of our Fund <br />Balance as being "Reserved for Encumbrances". We do not actually expense the <br />item in the old fiscal year. After the product is received, the payment goes <br />against the new fiscal year because the expense does not occur until the money <br />is paid. This process creates a series of journal entries where we credit <br />each account with a "Reserve for Encumbrance". At the end of the year, we <br />have to reverse the above mentioned entry. I also have to adjust the CAFR to <br />show the correct budget and expense amounts. <br />Because we have to charge the purchase order to the current year, it creates <br />considerable confusion with the division heads. It appears to them that the <br />expense will be charged against their current budget and because it is <br />included in their totals, it provides them with an inaccurate expense amount <br />to compare to the current budget. <br />If we amend each budget for the open purchase orders, it will alleviate the <br />above mentioned problem. The expense will still be shown in the current <br />fiscal year, and will be offset by the increase in their budget. Their funds <br />remaining will be accurate and it will completely do away with the adjustments <br />that I have to make at the end of the fiscal year. <br />The net effect on working capital under each method is the same. <br />In addition, at this time, I would also like to adjust the budget for the <br />following items that were budgeted in the last fiscal year but for some reason <br />or another, the funds were not expended. <br />There were $57,582 in funds remaining for the Houston Chemical Services <br />permitting process. These funds were budgeted by Council to be used for the <br />HCS process. I recommend we carry forward these funds to the current fiscal <br />year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.