Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EVALUATION FORM FOR QUALIFICATION STATEMENTS <br />CITY-WIDE DRAINAGE STUDY <br />Ratings are on a scale of 1-1 D, with 1 D being the highest. <br /> <br />OVERALL COMBINED RATING <br /> <br /> CLAUNCH JACOBS <br /> CRITERIA & MILLER DANNENBAUM CARTER & KLOTZ URS <br /> BURGESS <br />RELEVANT CONSULTANT <br />EXPERIENCE - the Firm's 1.875 1.9375 1.6875 2 1.625 <br />experience with master drainage <br />UNDERSTANDING OF THE <br />PROPOSED SCOPE - the Firm's <br />understanding of the issues facing 1.45 1.35 1.4 1.4 1.5 <br />the city in regard to drainage <br />management, and innovative <br />approach to solvina these issues. <br />PROJECT APPROACH - specific <br />project approach (work <br />plan/schedule), . quality assurance 1.8125 1.75 1.625 1.9375 1.8125 <br />processes and procedures and <br />technical support capabilities. <br />CURRENT CAPABILITIES - the <br />Firm's capacity to respond (current <br />workload and availability) and the <br />specific services provided by team <br />members regularly officing in facilities 1.3 1.5 1.35 1.55 1.35 <br />located within the greater Houston- <br />Galveston area with the ability to <br />quickly respond to issues arising <br />durinQ the study. <br />QUALITY AND RESPONSIVENESS <br />OF THE SUBMITTAL - the Firm's <br />responsiveness to the proposed 0.625 0.625 0.65 0.775 0.825 <br />scope of work, timeline and <br />evaluation criteria. <br /> TOTAL ADJUSTED SCORE 7.0625 7.1625 6.7125 7.6625 7.1125 <br />