My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2008
>
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:18:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />k lot z ~~~ ass 0 cia t e s <br /> <br />already exist. Proposals for sheet flow pathways, likewise, did not address whether the <br />City had the easement necessary to utilize the proposed sheet flow path; the sheet flow <br />path identification was based only upon apparent need and availability of open land for <br />the pathway. Detention ponds, likewise, assumed that acquisition of land could be <br />accomplished at locations where ponds might be located. <br /> <br />However, when making cost estimates for proposed improvements, account was taken of <br />reasonably likely cost for land acquisition. For channel widening, land acquisition for <br />maintenance berms (20-feet on each side of the channel) was assumed. Sheet flow <br />pathways assumed land acquisition would be required for a path 20 feet wide the full <br />length of the proposed pathway. For ponds, estimates of pond area were provided based <br />upon detention requirement and representative pond depth with 30-foot maintenance <br />berms; these areas defined minimum land acquisition requirements for the ponds. <br /> <br />Buy-out of lands with homes was not specifically identified as alternative for addressing <br />flooding problems. Channel widening was limited to estimated existing channel widths, <br />sheet flow paths were selected to avoid existing residents, and detention sites were <br />limited to currently undeveloped lands. Thus buy-out of homes is not being proposed as <br />part of this CWDS though some solutions will require that some portion of selected <br />nearby properties be acquired. <br /> <br />It is recognized that home buy-out is sometimes proposed as a flood control remedy; such <br />buy-out may become necessary in the future, but the current plan is intended not to rely <br />upon this strategy. <br /> <br />5.2.11 Ownership and Maintenance of Drainage Facilities <br /> <br />Within the three watersheds (Clear Creek, Armand, and San Jacinto/Galveston) which <br />compose the City, there are numerous named bayous and ditches. Seven are in the Clear <br /> <br />5-17 <br /> <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.008.000 <br />January 2009 <br /> <br />La Porte Citywide Drainage Study <br />City of La Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.