Laserfiche WebLink
Park Place <br />March 16, 1978 <br />Page 8 <br />3. Their conviction that considering all of the factors, <br />Park Place is the best alternative for Block 16 re- <br />gardless; of who is responsible-forthe project. <br />4. The monetary returns would be greater with Park Place <br />than any of the alternatives both for the•Johnsons and <br />for La Porte. <br />Our approach is, and will continue to be one of complete openess with <br />all aspects of the proposal. Evidence of t. is..was.willingness to "show <br />and tell" well before we were required -to, and of'our confidence i.n the <br />correctness of our proposal. <br />I would also like to take this opportunity to state that neither the <br />Johnsons nor I have any obligation or commitment to any particular <br />realtor. <br />Peter W. Dickson, Architect <br />Representing Joe and Grace Johnson <br />