My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-29-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1993
>
04-29-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:36 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:27:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/29/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> <br />Staff Report Bayou Forest Subdivision -Phase III May 20, 1993 <br />General Plan (Resubmittal) <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their April 29, 1993, meeting, reviewed the <br />General Plan for Phase III of the Bayou Forest Subdivision. The Commission disapproved <br />the plan as submitted. The applicant has resubmitted a revised General Plan. A reduced <br />copy of the revised plan has been included in the agenda packet as Exhibit A of the <br />preceding staff report. <br />Staff, in reviewing the original General Plan submittal, noted a series of items which needed <br />to be amended, added or clarified. These items are as follows: <br />1. Specify type of development. <br />2. Add block for filing date. <br />3. Plot utility easements. <br />• 4. Revise the designation of Unrestricted Reserve A. <br />5. Plot building setback lines. <br />6. Indicate flood plain designations and boundaries. <br />7. Complete and submit a Development Checklist. <br />8. Submit a Special Conditional Use Permit application. <br />9. Rename designated streets. <br />The applicant has addressed the above noted items. Rather than request a Special <br />Conditional Use Permit, the applicant has requested a rezoning of the subject tract. This <br />satisfies item #8. <br />Item #4 is, however, still at issue. The applicant, as requested, has clarified the designation <br />of Reserve A. Staff, in the preceding rezoning report, raised a series of planning issues <br />regarding Reserve A. These concerns were in large part based on the information provided <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.