My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-21-1998 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1990's
>
1998
>
07-21-1998 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:35 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:28:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/21/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Responses <br />-2- <br />August 11, 1998 <br />Road/Wharton Weems Blvd., both to be 4-lane roadways. As such, they would be <br />classified as a Secondary Arterial and Primary Arterial, respectively, each capable <br />of carrying 18-25,000 vehicles per day. Based on our ezperience, truck traffic <br />of the magnitude indicated, or for that matter, the same ratio spread over the <br />entire project would have little effect on the overall carrying capacity. This is <br />supported by the limited service area between the railroad and S.H. 146 and <br />the relative low intensity of development anticipated. <br />~ Rail Traffic Generation: The applicant has retained the services of two rail <br />consultants. Both have expressed to the Commission the benefits of the proposed <br />development on rail efficiency in the area and reduced conflicts at Fairmont <br />Parkway. Jerry Rowell of Frontier Logistics, the most recent consultant and <br />veteran rail freight administrator (S.P. RR.), was recently quoted in the Bayshore <br />Sun that the proposed project will "actually decrease rail traffic on Fairmont <br />Parkway". <br />However, both have also alluded to the likelihood of continued increase in rail <br />usage in the area, even without the proposed project, due to the plans of the <br />Port of Houston. This was confirmed by The Sun and with regard to the <br />subject project, concluded that "the point is moot", rail and vehicular traffic <br />will increase and "require that Fairmont Parkway overpass (be built), <br />anyway". This, in itself, as implicated in the article, will be the framework for <br />future efforts to capture political interest and public funding for this <br />important regional project. <br />D Driveway Access: We agree that driveway access can be handled through <br />covenants and architectural controls. The developer will establish a Traffic <br />Control Plan for the project that will include conditions and design standards <br />compatible with those of both the City and TxDOT. <br />~ Fairmont Parkway: The applicant has expressed on numerous occasions a <br />willingness to work with the City and the other public and private sector interests <br />to implement early construction of a grade separation at Fairmont Parkway. <br />Recent developments in growth and traffic demand have produced opportunities to <br />explore, heretofore unavailable to the community. <br />~ Utilities: Utility infrastructure within the area is limited. The developer <br />recognizes the need for working with the City to implement a program to obtain <br />area-wide water and sanitary sewer service within current policy. Project <br />engineers are aware of this and are awaiting preliminary approval to begin detailed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.