Laserfiche WebLink
O� L A <br />A <br />CITY OF LA PORTE PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br />9�/ 604 W. Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, TX 77571 <br />/ <br />m www.d.la-porte.bws <br />Phone: (281) 471-5020 / Fax (281) 842-1868 <br />TE XA8 <br />MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD <br />JUKE 10, 2004 <br />TO: Planning and Zoning Commission <br />FROM: City Planner <br />SUJECT: Texas Import/Export Project. <br />For your reference, the aerial photo of the project (Industrial Park) area is at enclosure 1. <br />As some of you know, the current Special Conditional Use Permit #02-002 for the referenced <br />project will expire on June 20, 2004; after its final extension. Given that no actions could be <br />taken in the time remaining to fulfill the requirements of that permit, Mr. Stuart Haynsworth <br />submitted an application for a new permit.on May 28, 2004. While it was understood that Mr. <br />Haynsworth would resubmit the same General Plan, he expressed issues and concerns with <br />the current Developer's Agreement. The application was submitted with a list of issues from <br />Mr.. Haynsworth (enclosure 2) which are summarized as follows: <br />• Request for initial building' permit for 8 acres of Phase 1-A of the SCUP being- the 8 <br />contiguous acres to the Union Pacific Rail Road for the purpose of constructing a rail <br />yard. <br />• Request that conveyances of land for streets not be required until respective <br />subsequent building permits are granted in those respective areas. <br />• . Request that any payment requested for a traffic study not be required since the <br />County has undertaken the construction of an overpass at Fairmont Parkway and <br />Powell Road [it should be noted that the overpass is actually designed to be over the <br />UPRR], or in the alternative that .any payment for that purpose be made only if a <br />building permit is granted for any area east of Powell Road, and an agreement with the <br />City is reached concerning economic benefit and need for the study. []Vote: on the <br />subsequent SCUP it was recognized that the payments to the City would not be for . <br />the overpass but for other development impacts as them become identified] <br />• Agreement on location of needed drainage detention reserves taking into account <br />existing drainage projects and planned detention locations such as nearby owners' land <br />in the flood plain.. <br />Given the complexity of the issues, the lack of a certified development site plan and the lack <br />of time available to coordinate the issues, a meeting with Mr. Haynsworth's group was held <br />on June 10, 2004. In attendance were Mr. Haynsworth (Partner), Mr. Golden (Partner), Mr. <br />,HI A <br />