My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
05-22-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2003
>
05-22-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/22/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />July 24; 2003 <br />#V 03-002 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />C7 <br />Anal sis: Section 106-192(b~1), in the~Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter, which is granted by the Board when strict <br />conformity to the chapter would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the <br />circumstances unique to the property on which the variance is granted <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board finds that all of the following conditions have been met. <br />• That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br />• That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography or .other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the specific piece of .property in question: <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself as <br />.distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br />• That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed. <br />In determining if granting the. applicant's request would be contrary to the general public, <br />Staff recognizes that the development of the property would not create a problem with <br />adjoining properties. <br />...When looking at the second condition, Staff has determined that the property does meet <br />the physical hardship test. Literal enforcement of current regulations would render the <br />site "unbuildable". As previously noted in this report, relief from the standard front yard <br />setback is being considered separately (under a special exception request); therefore, only <br />the rear yard issues are discussed in this report. <br />As shown on the attached site plan, an angling creek located at the rear of the property, <br />determines the location of the designated conservation area. That location in tum <br />determines~where the standard 20' conservation setback area is located on the property. <br />The ZBOA's final consideration is whether granting of this request, observes the spirit of <br />the ordinance. Based on the facts noted in this report, the applicant's request could be <br />considered reasonable if within the spirit of the ordinance. <br />An additional concern is the determination of the line on the property that represents <br />Mean Sea Level. This deteiinination may affect the applicant's ability to build based on <br />state and federal regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.