My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-24-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2003
>
07-24-2003 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:09:59 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M <br />Board of Adjustment <br />January 24, 2002 <br />#V 02-001 <br />Page 2 <br />hardship because of the circumstances unique to the property on which the <br />variance is granted <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the board is empowered to authorize a <br />variance from a requirement when the board finds that all of the following <br />conditions have been met. <br />❖ That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public <br />interest. <br />❖ Mat literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary <br />hardship because of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, <br />topography or other ' extraordinary or exceptional physical situation <br />unique to the specific piece of property in question. "Unnecessary <br />hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial <br />considerations or caprice, and the hardship must -not result from' the <br />applicant or property owner's own actions, and <br />❖ That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed <br />The Board must decide if the applicant's request to encroach into the 40' rear <br />building setbacks, despite the provisions found in Section 106-522 Table <br />B(2), is reasonable. The Board is charged with deciding whether all of the <br />above conditions have been met. <br />Staff cannot find evidence proving that a "hardship" exists. No unique <br />physical conditions exist on the applicant's property that will prevent the <br />project from complying with the City's "landscaping only in the 40' rear <br />setback when adjacent to residential" requirement. Site plans for AB Clean <br />Inc, located at 1440 Sens; and Catalyst Serving Inc., located at 1434 Sens <br />Road, both met this City "landscape only" and parking space requirements. <br />Furthermore, if the Board grants the applicant's Special Exception request <br />SEtl03-006 and sets the parking at a minimum of 179 spaces, he can meet his <br />parking requirements without utilizing this setback area for parking. (See <br />SE#03-006 Staff report for more details.) In turn, this eliminates the need for <br />this variance. <br />In addition, the applicant elevated his property several feet. If this is the final <br />elevation needed to assure proper drainage, this height reaches the middle of <br />the residential lots' rear fences. Once a structure is added, screening with tall <br />fast growing trees and scrubs will be needed to ensure that the proposed <br />development does not cause privacy. issues for the residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.