Laserfiche WebLink
(A) The action is likely to have an effect on that interest, either positive or negative, <br />that is distinguishable from its effect on other employees or officials, members of the public <br />in general or a substantial segment of the public. <br />(B) The effect of the action on that interest is direct, and not secondary or indirect. <br />However, the action need not be the only producing cause of the effect in order for the effect <br />to be direct. <br />Q The effect on the interest must be more than insignificant or de minimus in nature <br />or value. <br />(2) In determining whether a person, entity or property is or was affected by an official's or <br />employee's participation in proceedings, vote or decision, it will not be necessary to prove the <br />actual existence or occurrence of an economic effect or consequence if the effect or consequence <br />would be reasonably expected to exist or occur. <br />(o) Recusal and disclosure. A city official or employee whose conduct would otherwise violate <br />subsection (a), or a state conflict of interest law if he or she participated in proceedings or took <br />an action, must abstain from participation in the action in accordance with the following: <br />(1) Immediately refrain from further participation in the matter, including discussions with <br />any persons likely to consider the matter, from the time he or she discovers or reasonably should <br />have discovered the matter triggering the recusal; <br />(2) Promptly file necessary documentation disclosing the nature and extent of the interest <br />triggering the recusal with the city clerk, if the person is an official, or with the person's <br />supervisor, if the person is an employee; <br />(3) Promptly notify the person's supervisor of the nature and extent of the interest triggering <br />the recusal, if the person is a city employee, so that the supervisor can reassign responsibility for <br />handling the matter to another person; and <br />(4) Promptly disclose the interest triggering the recusal, if the person is a member of the city <br />council, a city board or commission, to other members of the city council, board or commission, <br />and leave the room in which the city council, board or commission is meeting during the board <br />or commission's discussion of, or voting on, the matter. <br />(d) No prohibition established in this section shall be construed to prevent members of city <br />council, or the appointees to any board or commission of the city, or a city employee, from <br />voting on or participating in a matter relating to the adoption of laws, rules and/or policies that <br />apply generally to all employees, officials and/or members of the public and the effect of which <br />does not confer a benefit on the official or employee that is distinguishable from the effect on <br />other employees, officials or members of the public or a substantial segment of the public. <br />Section 4. Standards of conduct. <br />(a) Standards for immediate family memhers. A city official or employee commits a violation of <br />this policy if an immediate family member, with the official's or employee's knowledge, <br />intentionally or knowingly: <br />(1) Solicits, accepts or agrees to accept from another person any benefit that the member's <br />relative, who is a city officer or employee, is prohibited from soliciting, accepting or agreeing to <br />accept under state law; <br />(2) Misuses any official information obtained from the member's relative, who is a city <br />officer or employee, to which the relative has access by virtue of the relative's office or <br />employment and that has not been made public, in a manner prohibited as to the relative under <br />state law; or <br />