Laserfiche WebLink
From: Greg Smith <Greg.Smith @thc.state.tx.us> <br /> Subject: FW: Sylvan Beach SAL <br /> Date: March 28, 2011 4:17:03 PM CDT <br /> To: "Ted Powell (savethepavilion @comcast.net)" <savethepavilion @comcast.neb, "Ted Powell (tapowell2 @comcast.net)" <br /> <tapowel l2 @ comcast. neb <br /> 1 Attachment, 13.9 KB <br /> Here you go, Ted. <br /> We understand that there is some concern about whether the State Archeological landmark designation of the Sylvan <br /> Beach Pavilion would delay the federally- funded project to rehabilitate the property, so we are providing clarification <br /> regarding the requirements and review procedures of the Antiquities Code of Texas and Section 106 of the National <br /> Historic Preservation Act. <br /> • Harris County has received a Hurricane Ike Recovery Grant from the Texas Department of Rural Affairs for <br /> rehabilitation of the pavilion. This project requires review by our office under Section 106 of the National Historic <br /> Preservation Act due to the federal source of the grant funds. <br /> The pavilion is already protected under the State Antiquities Code through interim protection. Once a valid State <br /> Archeological (SAL) nomination for a building or structure has been received and the commission's staff determines <br /> the property is eligible for designation, no project work may be undertaken on the property without a permit issued <br /> by the commission unless or until the commission denies the nomination or designation. (13 Tex. Admin. Code § <br /> 26.12(c). <br /> • The nomination for the Sylvan Beach Pavilion has been evaluated as valid, and consequently, an Antiquities Permit <br /> will be required for work performed while it is under consideration. <br /> Potential archeological properties at the pavilion site are already protected under the Antiquities Code of Texas <br /> regardless of the building's SAL status. <br /> • The likelihood of significant archeological properties at the pavilion site is remote; the Texas Historical Commission <br /> does not anticipate further investigations that would delay the project beyond the review period required under <br /> Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. <br /> • SAL designation would not delay project review under Section 106 or the Antiquities Code. The Texas Historical <br /> Commission routinely reviews projects concurrently under the Antiquities Code of Texas and Section 106 of the <br /> National Historic Preservation Act. Review of the proposed project pursuant to an Antiquities Permit application <br /> would not be onerous or add further delays. The same architectural reviewer involved with the Section 106 review <br /> also handles SAL permit applications for each region of the state. <br /> • Texas Historical Commission staff reviews all projects relative to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the <br /> Treatment of Historic Properties to determine if proposed work meets accepted preservation practice. Work <br /> considered to have no adverse effect" to a historic property under Section 106 review would be eligible for an <br /> Antiquities Permit. <br /> Gregory Smith <br /> National Register Coordinator <br /> History Programs Division <br /> Texas Historical Commission <br /> PO Box 12276 <br /> Austin, Texas 78711 <br /> 512 - 463 -6013 <br /> www.thc.state.tx.us <br /> TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION <br />