Laserfiche WebLink
<br />THE F.Y 1988-89 BUDGET <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Manager's Message, page 2 <br /> <br />These improvements were approved at a time when the Houston economy was at <br />its dimmest. In La Porte, we chose to respand in positive fashion. Under <br />the leadership of the City Council, we were able to roll back tax rates, <br />maintain existing utility rates and rely on fund balances and retained <br />earnings to weather the economic backlash from the Houston area. <br /> <br />The central administrative theme of FY 1988-89 is "a commitment to <br />planning." This theme will direct this administrations's efforts to <br />provide quality public service delivery. It shall also enable staff to <br />help position the City for the next scheduled bond sales. The first such <br />sale is scheduled for December, 1988 and will be earmarked for a Solid <br />Waste Landfill. The'second bond sale, of $3.3 million, shall occur in <br />~ugust, 1989 and will be restricted to water and sewer improvements. <br /> <br />The City's FY 1988-89 budget for both the General and 'Utility Funds total <br />$16,305,707. Compared to FY 1987-88's budget, this figure reflects a 5.91 <br />percent increase. However, were the prop~sed Bayshore Municipal. Utility <br />District's annexation.to be excluded, this figure would result 'in only a <br />2.81 percent increase over last year's budget. <br /> <br />Three b~dgetary priorities underlie the FY- 1988-89 budget. They are the <br />annexation of the Bayshore Municipal Utility District; the necessary <br />preparations associated with the conversion to surface water distribution; <br />and lastly, the costs associated with the completion of the previou~ly <br />mentioned Bond Projects. <br /> <br />In order to,meet this coming year's ma~ntenance and ~perational expeDses, <br />staff is recommending the City's tax rate be increased by two (2) cents on <br />the tax dollar. - This recommendation is no~ made 'lightly nor' without <br />justification. - In addition to the reasons already provided, there are <br />three additional factors which impact the necessity for the tax rate <br />increase. <br /> <br />First, Federal Revenue Sharing is now a fading memory and its absence is <br />already beginning to be'felt., I believe ~ts absenc~ will continue to be <br />felt in years to cqme.. In the ,past, Federal Revenue Sharing provided the <br />City coffers approximately $25~,OO~ each budget year. <br /> <br />Secondly, in -1984, the City's Parks and Recreation Department administered <br />a total of 47 acres of .developed park land. By October, 1988, this same, <br />department will be responsible for an additional 74 acres of park land, <br />bringing its maintenance requirements up to 121 acres. This phenomenal <br />development requires tha~ the City pay special attention to the operating <br />details associated with the professional management of an expanding <br />parkland system. <br />