My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/6/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council <br />January 6, 1982, Page 8 <br />5. City Attorney Knox Askins read: A RESOLUTION URGING VOTERS <br />TO SUPPORT THE LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY <br />A motion was made by Councilperson Faris to approve and accept. <br />Resolution No. 82-1 as read. Seconded by Councilperson Skelton. <br />Malone: Mr. Mayor, I have been in the situation where my <br />city pays a water bill to another city, and it's not a very <br />good situation to find yourself in. I think since this was <br />approved and passed by the State Legislature for the City of <br />La Porte, I feel we should be on the controlling end of this <br />thing. There is a real public need for this. We are all <br />victims of subsidence and flooding. This is one of the reasons <br />for having this. That's why we all had to get off of our <br />water wells 20 years ago in Lomax. Maybe not 20 years ago. <br />This action would pint us in the driver's seat, selling it to <br />the other cities. Hopefully, by selling water to other cities <br />and industries would enable us to sell to our citizens a little <br />cheaper. It is my understanding that the revenue generated <br />from the sale of treated water will wholly support this Authority. <br />I have studied this and talked to other people, and I see no <br />• reason why this is not to the best interest of the City of <br />La Porte. <br />Skelton: Mr. Mayor, I, too, think this would be best for the <br />City of La Porte. I would rather our city be in control, and <br />I know that Deer Park would rather have this and sell us water. <br />I know that it is going to cost more money, more out of my <br />pocket, as well as the citizens in my area. But T think over- <br />all it is best for the City. I might add, recently Harris- <br />Galveston County Subsidence District recently cut the water <br />supply to League City about half. They have had to buy more <br />water from Houston. This same thing could happen to La Porte <br />at any time. I'm definitely in favor. <br />Gay: Mr. Mayor, I also would like to touch on the situation. <br />Water is one of our most critical items within the next 10 <br />years. We just as well get down to brass tacks and realize we <br />have a need. I am wanting to be on the end to sell water, not <br />the end that has to pay and pay. T'm like Mr. Skelton, I know <br />it will cost more out of my pocket, but this is something the <br />citizens of La Porte must realize, that water is going to be <br />one of the main items, so this is almost mandatory that we get <br />on surface water, and I believe we should be the controlling <br />interest. <br />•_ Simons: I am in favor of everything my colleagues have stated. <br />We also have to stop and remember one thing: if we put this in <br />today it will be a lot cheaper than 5 or 10 years from now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.