1991-06-24 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

e e Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte city Council June 24, 1991, Page 2 OF LA PORTE, FOR 1991-1992 LANDSCAPE COST SHARING PROGRAM PROJECT ALONG STATE LOOP 401, FROM STATE HIGHWAY 146 TO BROADWAY STREET (MAIN STREET IN LA PORTE); MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Motion was made by Councilperson Clarke to adopt Ordinance 1763 as read by the city Attorney. Second by Councilperson Sutherland. The motion carried, 7 ayes and 0 nays. Nays: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Porter, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Pro Tern McLaughlin None Ayes: 11. Council considered an ordinance approving and authorizing an easement to Houston Lighting and Power Company. The City Attorney read: . ORDINANCE 1764 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN EASEMENT TO HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY FROM THE CITY OF LA PORTE, GRANTING A FIFTY FOOT (50') RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A 138KV ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINE, ALONG THE SOUTH EDGE OF BLOCKS 475 AND 474, TOWN OF LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A PORTION OF THE ADJOINING FORMER "H" STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Motion was made by Councilperson Cooper to adopt Ordinance 1764 a read by the city Attorney. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 7 ayes and 0 nays. Nays: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Porter, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Pro Tern McLaughlin None Ayes: 12. Council considered a resolution requesting that La Porte remain wholly within Harris County Commissioners Precinct Two. The City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 91-09 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE REQUESTING THAT LA PORTE REMAIN WHOLLY WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRECINCT TWO Motion was made by Councilperson Thrower to approve Resolution 91-09 as read by the city Attorney. Second by Councilperson Sutherland. The motion carried, 7 ayes and 0 nays.