My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
1980's
>
1985
>
08-15-1985 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/15/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />AUGUST 15, 1985 <br />PAGE 3 <br />n <br />so we're recommending that the height be raised <br />to a greater height than is listed, also <br />recommend that dwelling units per acre for single <br />families be increased to 4.8 units per acre which <br />is currently the dwelling units per acre that we <br />are achieving in the Fairmont Park area. Were <br />also recommending that the multi-family dwelling <br />units per acre be increased to 27 dwelling units <br />per acre. <br />Sect. 5 - 701- <br />Provides for additional setback along <br />thoroughfares and we are suggesting that the <br />current 10 ft. wide yard setback next to the <br />public right-of-ways is sufficient and that the <br />extra 5 feet not be residential area or that <br />extra 10 feet in the commercial area is not <br />necessary. <br />Sect. 5-201 - We are dealing with the greenway <br />corridor and the 20' land scaping setback along <br />the corridor and we feel like this is a very <br />important area that neds to be considered. We <br />actually feel that the greenbelt area is a park <br />land which the City of La Porte should allocate <br />r park funds toward a purchase for manhours and if <br />an extra 20 ft. of land scaped area is desired, <br />that the City should purchase that landscaped <br />area and maintain it. We feel like that is the <br />most sufficient way for the City to keep proper <br />maintenance for our areas that they would like to <br />see as park lands and since it is park land, we <br />feel like the City should allocate the funds and <br />actually purchase it from the land owners. That <br />same idea applies to the greenway or the land <br />scaping setback areas along the park way <br />corridors. We don't actually find a definition <br />of parkway corridors in the zoning ordinance but <br />if it is justifying a type of thoroughfare type <br />situation, then the same thing would apply; the <br />City actually purchases any landscaped <br />thoroughfare and landscape their property and <br />maintain that at the City's expense. <br />Section 5-800 - Specifies that the zoning <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.