My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
Agenda packets
>
City Council
>
2013
>
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2013 8:26:57 AM
Creation date
4/3/2025 3:05:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
2/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
printable PDF files, but preferably as live forms that can be completed an <br />electronically. <br />6.To the greatest extent possible with the current computer system <br />available on-line so that applicants can obtain status updates as easily as p <br />Where the computer system falls short, establish an information ill track <br />status of projects and provide contact information to the custom <br />information. The objective is to develop a system within the constraints of t <br />computer software system, to provide substantive information to omer on a <br />timely basis. <br />7.Post the office hours by the outside door. City hall hours are posted, which may cause <br />customers to think the office is closed when it is actually open <br /> <br />8.Departmental staff should proactively notify the city management <br />interactions that may be reasonably expected to evolve into more <br />relations situations. <br /> <br />9.Revise the Planning & Zoning Commission public hearing agenda format. The <br />following agenda sequence is proposed: <br />i.Staff Presentation <br />ii.Applicant Presentation <br />iii.Public Comments (for, against, or simply questions) <br />iv.Question and Answer <br /> <br />The current public hearing agenda format encourages the Commissi <br />before all of the information has been presented and also puts tion <br />of answering questions better answered by the applicant. The Commission should allow <br />all information to be presented in items i-iii before asking questions under item iv. Any <br />questions posed by the public during item iii should be noted bysion and <br />then asked by the Commission during the question and answer peri <br />question and answer period, questions should be directed by the <br />the staff or applicant, depending on who is in the better position to answer the <br />particular question. <br /> <br />B.Cumbersome Processes <br />Findings <br />The cumbersome nature of the NaviLine software system appears to <br />sluggishness and inconsistencies that customers experience. Iro <br />6 Planning Department Review Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.