Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT C <br />Both of these driveways should be designed with increased radii to accommodate <br />the largest vehicles anticipated to make trips to and from the site (likely a WB-62 or <br />WB-67), but site engineers should check to ensure adequate geometry is being <br />provided for truck turning movements. There is some offset alignment at the north <br />driveway, but with existing turning movements very low at the existing Vapor Point, <br />LLC driveway, and low turning movements projected for the new distribution center <br />drive. <br />B. Off-Site Improvements <br />The analysis indicates that no off-site improvements will be necessary to <br />accommodate site generated traffic at the existing intersections included in the study <br />area. Critical movements at the Fairmont at S. 16 Street intersection were found to <br />th <br />be minimally impacted by development traffic by examination of level of service and <br />queue simulation output. <br />Warrants for both left turn lanes and right turn lanes were examined for the site <br />driveways on South 16 Street. In lieu of local guidelines for right turn lanes, the site <br />th <br />driveway on South 16 <br />th <br />guideline from the TxDOT Access Management Manual (60 vehicles per hour for <br />roadways less than 45 mph). The peak hour volumes projected for the driveways on <br />South 16 Street include about 10-15 right turns in the AM & PM peak hours, well <br />th <br />under the 60 turns per hour guideline. According to this often used guideline, no right <br />turn deceleration lane would be required for the new development at either driveway. <br />For left turns, the warrants used included techniques specified in the National <br />Cooperative Highway Re <br />Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide. These guidelines <br />are very similar to the AASHTO guidelines referenced in the TxDOT Access <br />Management Manual. Regarding the left turn lane warrants, the NCHRP 457 figures <br />for a two-lane roadway indicated that a left turn will not be required for either driveway. <br />C. Other recommendations <br />According to PICM, Section 6, construction of a sidewalk along the site frontage <br />would be required unless waived by city staff, which should be considered given the <br />open-ditch cross section of South 16 Street. <br />th <br />Disclaimer: This report has been prepared to assist in assessing the impacts of traffic generated by the subject development and is intended to <br />provide an overview of relevant issues and represents the best estimates and opinion of Voigt Associates, Inc. While traffic forecasts cannot be <br />precise forecasts, they do represent, in our view, a reasonable expectation for the future based on the information available to us as of the date <br />of this report. The estimates contained within this document rely on engineering assumptions and judgments and may be influenced by external <br />circumstances that are subject to changes that may materially affect the conclusions drawn. <br />©2016 Voigt Associates, Inc. This report and all material herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, <br />distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast in whole or in part by any public or private entity without the prior express written <br /> <br />permission of Voigt Associates, Inc. <br />ES-2 <br />Voigt Associates, Inc. Project 30605 GCP 16 Street Traffic Impact Analysis <br />th <br />March 2016 Prepared for Generational Commercial <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />