Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />What standards are used to guide <br />the auditor? <br />What is the optimal duration for <br />an audit contract? <br />Financial statement audits are conducted in ac- <br />cordance with generally accepted auditing stan- <br />dards (GARS). These standards historically have <br />been established by the Auditing Standards <br />Board of the American Institute of Certified Pub- <br />lic Accountants (AICPA). In many cases, GARS <br />are supplemented by additional standards set <br />forth in the U.S. General Accounting Off`ice's <br />(GAO) publication Government Auditing Stan- <br />dards (also known as the "Yellow Book"). The <br />combination of GAAS and the Yellow Book stan- <br />dards is often referred to simply as "generally ac- <br />ceptedgovernment auditing standards" or <br />"GALAS." <br />For attestation engagements, the appropriate <br />guidelines are set by the AICPA's Attestation <br />Standards, which are supplemented by certain <br />additional standards for attestation engage- <br />ments set forth in the Yellow Book. When an at- <br />testation engagement is conducted in conformity <br />with both the AICPA's Attestation Standards <br />and the additional relevant Yellow Book stan- <br />dards it is said to have been performed in accor- <br />dance with GALAS. <br />In the case of performance audits, all of the rele- <br />vant standards are found in the Yellow Book and <br />are referred to as GALAS. <br />Failure of an external auditor to follow GAAS or <br />GALAS is a serious matter. Substandard audits <br />can result in disciplinary action against external <br />auditors, including revocation of the auditor's li- <br />cense to practice as a certified public accountant. <br />Such failure can also expose the auditor to signif- <br />icant legal liability. <br />4 AN ELECTED OFFICIAL'S GUIDE <br />Auditors are required to gain and document an <br />understanding of a government's framework of <br />internal controls as part of the audit planning <br />process. Understandably, this process is espe- <br />cially costly in the first year of an audit, because <br />the auditors are becoming acquainted with and <br />documenting the internal control structure for <br />the first time. <br />A multi-year audit contract has the advantage of <br />allowing auditors to recover these and similar <br />start-up costs over a longer period of time, and <br />so can lead to lower overall audit costs. Also, <br />multi-year audit contracts can help to create <br />valuable continuity in the audit process. Accord- <br />ingly, the GAO is on record recommending the <br />"entities should consider using multi-year agree- <br />ments, preferably of a five-year duration, due to <br />the potential cost savings and continuity benefits <br />over the long-term."s <br />Of course, governments must retain their right <br />to terminate such multi-year contracts should <br />the auditor's performance prove unsatisfactory. <br />CPA Audit Quality: A Framework for Procuring Audit <br />Services (August 1987), p. 28. <br />TO AUDITING 45 <br />