My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 7:55:51 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:37:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/20/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 7 <br />609(a)(1). Consequently, cable operators are unlikely to use <br />section 613(d)(1) to avoid contractual obligations unless the <br />consent of the franchising authority is obtained and appropriate <br />revisions made in the franchise agreement. In most cases, cable <br />operators are likely to seek consent of the franchising authority <br />and modification of the franchise agreement in order to ensure <br />that removal of a particular service cannot be construed as a <br />breach of the franchise agreement during the franchi-se renewal <br />process. <br />Program content control. Section <br />control of program content. Under <br />franchise agreement may prohibit o <br />provision of obscene programming o <br />child pornography which is not <br />Constitution. <br />FACILITIES <br />607(f) prohibits government <br />section 607(h), however, a <br />r impose restrictions on the <br />r other programming such as <br />protected speech under the <br />Existing franchises. Any provision of an existing franchise <br />agreement or a franchise agreement resulting from an RFP issued <br />prior to October 1, 1982 which requires the provision of particu- <br />lar facilities (e.g., institutional and subscriber networks of a <br />particular capacity, studios) or cable -related equipment (e.g., <br />cameras, vans) is grandfathered (Sec. 613(f)). <br />New franchises. Under any franchise granted after the date of <br />enactment (unless the RFP was issued prior to October 1, 1982 in <br />which case facility requirements are grandfathered by section <br />613(f)), a city may mandate the provision of particular facili- <br />ties, including subscriber and institutional networks of a mini- <br />mum capacity, studios, cameras, and vans, in the RFP both during <br />initial franchising and refranchising (Sec. 613(b)(2)). <br />Significant change in circumstances. Under section 613(d)(2), a <br />city is required to enter into negotiations with the cable opera- <br />tor for the purpose of modifying or altering franchise require- <br />ments mandating the provision of particular facilities whenever <br />the cable operator shows that: (1) there has been a significant <br />change in circumstances; and (2) as a result of this change in <br />circumstances, the provision of particular facilities is imprac- <br />ticable for technical, economic or other reasons. If the parties <br />are not able to reach agreement on appropriate changes in the <br />franchise agreement within 45 days, the matter must be submitted <br />to arbitration. The purpose of this provision, according to <br />floor debate, is to establish procedures for the review of <br />facility commitments and the provision is intended to be utilized <br />only in limited circumstances. <br />u <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.