My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-28-99 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
1990's
>
1999
>
10-28-99 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:10:28 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:33:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/28/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />January 27, 2000 <br />#NCS 2000-001 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />basis. This would indicate that additional parking is needed, probably <br />beyond the 16 spaces proposed by the applicant. For this facility, 135 on - <br />site spaces should be available for parking. <br />Building Setbacks — Gaining compliance in this area would not provide a <br />measurable benefit. Acquiring additional property to meet the building <br />setback provisions is not recommended. <br />Number of Dwelling Units per Acre — The submitted proposal does <br />include a playground and recreational amenities along with a new Gazebo <br />which would provide some activity centers for the occupants. Current <br />development standards limit buildable area or lot coverage to 600/0. <br />Flamingo Bay has a lot coverage of 32% which would indicate that there <br />is a sufficient amount of open space within this site. The number of <br />dwelling units per acre or density of this site has previously not had an <br />adverse affect on utility service. For these reasons, reducing the dwelling <br />units per acre from 31 to 27 is not recommended. <br />Landscaping — The proposed plan submitted by the applicant shows a <br />sufficient amount of landscaping distributed around the buildings and <br />throughout the site. A recommendation would be to include additional <br />landscaping around buildings #2, #4, and #7 to enhance the appearance <br />from the adjacent streets and provide some relief from the setback <br />encroachment. In addition, all landscaped areas should have a sprinkler <br />system to ensure healthy, sustainable plants. <br />Conclusions: Of all the nonconforming issues discussed in this report the most critical is <br />the deficiency in parking. While occupied, the existing amount of Parking <br />was not adequate for residents and visitors which resulted in overflow <br />parking onto the adjacent streets. This created an unsafe situation with <br />through traffic having to maneuver around parked vehicles. In addition, <br />vehicles backing into the streets would not have as much room to maneuver. <br />The Planning Director's recommendations are as follows: <br />• Re4uire the applicant to provide 135 on -site (off-street) parking spaces. <br />• Accept the existing building setback encroachments. <br />• Accept the existing number of dwelling units per acre. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.